Canada: The Schizophrenic Approach to Environmental Policy

Details of last month's budget bill and our new approach to auto emissions are now out, and  it's clear that Canada's Conservatives are continuing their whishy-washy but effective attack on our environmental policies and programs.  The government has announced that it will be following the USA in implementing a national policy based on California Auto emissions standards. This just months after the Environment Minister ridiculed Quebec for adopting identical standards. Overall though, that's a good thing and not a surprise.

What is a surprise is that it will be effectively canning the ecoENERGY home retrofit program, and will savage our national Environmental Impact Assessment Process.   No new applications will be accepted for ecoEnergy's $5,000 grants.  Despite adding an extra $80million for the program just weeks ago, the government is arguing that there is only enough money to cover homeowners already enrolled in the project. I hope we see some scrutiny of those numbers over the next few days.

But regardless, scrapping the program wastes a fantastic opportunity to make necessary common-sense home efficiency measures affordable to average Canadians.  It's not the first time though.  One of the first things that the Conservatives did when they first got into office in 2006 was to scrap a similar Liberal program, starting with funds earmarked for low-income families.  They later brought the program back, with a lower budget and no provisions to help poorer Canadian (who can't afford the upfront costs of renovations) access the money.

But what is happenning to EIAs is worse.  In the last 24 hours it has become public that the government plans to decimate the environmental impact assessment process.  The Globe has the deails here.  The thing that is most disturbing to me though is the way in which all this is being done.  Since when is a budget the proper vehicle  to push through this type of change?  The government knows full well that the other parties don't want to trigger an election and they are using the budget to force completely undemocratic changes to government policies. 

I'd say that even if we've got serious fiscal and environmental deficits, Canada's most worrying deficit is a democratic one.

Comments

1 Response to "Canada: The Schizophrenic Approach to Environmental Policy"

Andrew Gage said... 6 April 2010 at 12:42

Thanks for your post, Canada: The Schizophrenic Approach to Environmental Policy. On the CEAA amendments hidden in the Budget Implementation Act, you might be interested in our post - Good environmental laws require a government that’s not afraid of public debate: http://wcel.org/resources/environmental-law-alert/good-environmental-laws-require-government-that%E2%80%99s-not-afraid-publi

About




This is a blog for news and views on the future of sustainable cites. A major revamp is in the works. Until then I am keeping this version up as an archive of my past writing.

You can expect occasional updates, but not with the same frequency as in the past.

You can also find my writing on urban redesign and sustainability in ReNew Canada, The Mark, Sustainable Cities Canada, WorldChanging, and other more specialized academic publications.

Info on my consulting work, c.v. and current research focus is all here.


Browse Older Posts